Bartolus Appellate intelligence

Data-driven Oral Argument Preparation

Bartolus tags every question judges ask at oral argument — purpose, technique, tone — and turns your panel’s record into a prep report for your case.

Nemo bonus iurista nisi bartolista.

Podium Mode: the report’s questions, one at a time. Answer out loud, mark each one, and keep notes your whole team sees on every device. More on Podium Mode →

In the Justices’ own words

Every Justice-specific question in a Bartolus prep report rests on a pattern that recurs in that Justice’s arguments. The report shows each pattern with three of the Justice’s prior questions, verbatim, cited to the transcript.

BartolusOral argument prep

Justice Kagan

Recurring pattern

KAG-01 Demand an administrable boundary across adjacent categories 6 arguments (2017–2025)

Prior questions (verbatim)

“And I was wondering where in this scale that you’re using would discrimination on the basis of gender come. Would -- would that be a compelling state interest? So, for example, if there’s an agency that refuses to employ women, would the state have to contract with that agency?”

— Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (Nov. 4, 2020), Tr. 45:8

“So I guess somebody could make the same argument about computers. Well, it doesn’t really -- it’s separate from the religious instruction that might be carried out over those computers. Do you think that that’s the same, or is it different?”

— Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer (Apr. 19, 2017), Tr. 7:18

“I mean, where would you put a tailor, a tailor who makes a wonderful suit of clothes? Where does that come in?”

— Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (Dec. 5, 2017), Tr. 13:22
BartolusOral argument prep

Chief Justice Roberts

Recurring pattern

ROB-03 Identify the fact change that would change the result 3 arguments (2021–2025)

Prior questions (verbatim)

“What is the simplest thing that the Catholic Charities would have to do to qualify for the religious exemption in Wisconsin?”

— Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (Mar. 31, 2025), Tr. 81:6

“Are you saying that if they just had one chapel service every -- every day or -- or let’s just say that they take a religious perspective on -- on history, just that. Are they going to likely be qualified or likely -- unlikely?”

— Carson v. Makin (Dec. 8, 2021), Tr. 62:7

“It’s simply the coach going out to midfield, kneeling -- taking a knee, and that’s it? No dispute about who’s responsible for cutting off the negotiations. Take out the media stuff. Would the school have any problem in that case? Or would the case be just the same?”

— Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (Apr. 25, 2022), Tr. 61:17

Excerpts from a Supreme Court prep report.

The free dashboard is SCOTUS. The product is your circuit.

Prep reports are built from the same methodology for any federal circuit — your panel, your record, your case.

How it works

Transcript-first. The report is built from what your judges have actually asked, applied to what your case actually argues.

Tag the corpus.

Every question in every argument transcript is tagged by purpose, technique, and tone.

Profile your panel.

Your judges’ tagged records become behavioral profiles: how each opens, what each presses, and what makes each shut an argument down.

Report built on your briefs.

Bartolus reads both briefs in full and writes predicted questions, each with the passages in your brief that answer it, page citations included.

The dashboard

The same tagging that builds the reports, public on the current Supreme Court term. Explore the methodology before you commit.

Oct. Term 2025 · All nine justices · 58 cases

Every question of OT2025, tagged and searchable — free.

Filter by justice, purpose, technique, or tone. Click any number to read the questions behind it.

Open the dashboard →

Request a prep report

Available for arguments in any federal circuit and the Supreme Court. Turnaround is typically 48–72 hours once briefs are received.

We stand behind Bartolus. We’ll send the report before you pay. If it doesn’t satisfy you, delete it. You pay nothing.

contact@bartolus.law

We reply within one business day with scope and timeline.

About

Bartolus is a product of Greil Analytics LLC.

John Greil

Founder · Greil Analytics LLC · Bartolus

John Greil is a law professor and practicing appellate attorney. He has argued at the federal circuit and state supreme court level, clerked at the federal appellate level, and holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School. He built Bartolus because he wanted a prep tool that could test empirical data against gut feelings — and couldn’t find one that did.

Feedback

Disagree with a tag? Found a bug? We’re listening.

Every note goes directly to the person who built this. We read them all.